The Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (AOAC International) announced their new project to develop technical requirements, evaluate, and certify the performance of test kits that calculate total yeast and mold organisms in cannabis flower.
The Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (AOAC International) recently announced their new initiative to develop technical requirements, evaluate, and certify the performance of test kits that calculate total yeast and mold organisms in cannabis flower (1).
This new project will apply the Emergency Response Validation option of the AOAC Research Institute’s Performance Tested Methods (PTM) and AOAC International’s Official Methods of Analysis (OMA) programs with oversite from the Cannabis Analytical Science Program (CASP) advisory council. CASP reportedly brings together leaders from state and federal government, industry, academia, and contract laboratories to develop consensus-based standards and scientific methods for cannabis microbiological and chemical analysis (2).
For this joint program, it will allow for the rapid development of emergency Standard Method Performance RequirementsSM (SMPRs) through CASP to provide acceptance criteria for method validation while also conducting an evaluation and review of multiple test kit models in parallel through the PTM and OMA Programs to ramp up the availability and variety of certified test kits.
Yeasts and molds are able to grow in a large variety or environmental conditions, which can result in contamination of products and significant economic loss. With the absence of a federal framework of regulations for cannabis, states have been individually developing microbial testing requirements and setting action limits for approving or rejecting batches. According to the press release, most states have set action levels at one of two concentrations for total yeast and mold analysis: < 103 or 104 CFU/g (1). Between 10–20% of cannabis batches are estimated to fail these microbial contaminant requirements (3). Recent surveys of cannabis products were able to determine the presence of more than 4000 different fungal taxonomic classifications in cannabis flower, which included several pathogenic fungal agents.
Regulators with states have requested that testing facilities use AOAC validated methods to ensure safer products reach consumers. Currently, there are no AOAC certified methods for mold and yeast enumeration in cannabis products available. With this new endeavor, the main goal will be to create an emergency SMPR while also concurrently performing a matric extension to cannabis flower for PTM or OMA certified yeast and mold methods or be able to grant an Emergency Response PTM status for new methods.
The project began in mid-October 2020. Regulators, method developers, and cannabis or hemp laboratories interested in becoming a part of CASP or wanting to submit a method as part of the validation study are highly encouraged to get involved.
For more information about submitting a method or becoming involved in CASP, contact Scott Coates at scoates@aoac.org, or Deborah McKenzie at dmckenzie@aoac.org.
Ep 24, Part III: Data Transparency in Cannabis Testing with Yasha Kahn
December 26th 2024In the final part of this episode, Evan Friedmann and Yasha Kahn discuss the need for a national entity to centralize cannabis data collection, moving from snapshot data to continuous updates. They emphasize the importance of accurate lab data and adverse event tracking, suggesting QR codes on packaging to report issues. Yasha suggests harsher consequences for result manipulation and suggests collaboration between state departments and federal entities to support underfunded regulators. They also discuss the potential benefits of off-the-shelf testing and the importance of stability testing. Finally, Yasha shares his top three reading recommendations for the audience.
Ep 24, Part II: Data Transparency in Cannabis Testing with Yasha Kahn
December 12th 2024Evan Friedmann and Yasha Kahn, co-founder of MCR Labs, discuss the discrepancies between current regulations and data on mycotoxins and pesticides in cannabis products. They highlight the need for updated regulations based on new data, emphasizing the importance of accurate testing and labeling. They also discuss the issue of result manipulation, particularly in THC content, and the need for public health officials to address this. Yasha suggests making testing data public to enhance oversight and suggests a national entity to manage this data for better consistency and public safety.