The cannabis business license application system has raised concerns with several stakeholders.
On April 17, 2024, the Minnesota House voted 69-62 to allow pre-approvals for cannabis businesses licenses ahead of the planned opening of the market (1). Recreational cannabis was legalized in the state in August 2023, and the cannabis market is expected to fully open in early 2025 (2,3). Earlier this year, regulators from the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) had estimated that in order to meet the requirements listed in state law, 381 cannabis dispensaries will need to be opened, though they also added that accurately understanding the supply and demand of the market will need to wait until after the market opens (3).
The bill was sponsored by Representative Zack Stephenson who explained in MPR News that, “A number of provisions in this bill are designed to expedite the process of setting up a good legitimate marketplace for cannabis to displace that illicit marketplace that’s out there” (1). The pre-approval process for the state-issued licenses could start within the next few months (1).
Furthermore, the Department of Health would no longer regulate medical cannabis or hemp-derived cannabinoid products—that would now fall under the Office of Cannabis Management (1).
The bill also introduced a lottery system for license applicants, changing the merit-based system that allotted more points to applicants who met certain criteria (1). Currently, in addition to the social equity element, points are allotted based on criteria such as business plan and experience in the market (2,4). The merit-based system reportedly offered a social justice element to the application for individuals negatively affected by past cannabis prohibition, veterans, and others, yet concerns arose surrounding the system’s potential for bias and lawsuits (4).
"Subjective merit points-based systems have encountered some challenges and have not been particularly successful in yielding…equitable outcomes," explained Charlene Briner, interim director of the OCM (4). "In order to do this in a way that we're going to be able to launch in a timely manner and not encounter the kind of injunctive delays that have plagued other states, this is where we landed."
Pushback to the lottery system emerged earlier this month, and concerns with the new system were voiced this week in a letter to lawmakers (1). “The simplicity of the lottery system allows for exploitation through application flooding, submission of spurious applications, and the manipulation of social equity measures by predatory entities,” wrote cannabis entrepreneurs to lawmakers (1). “Such practices undermine genuine competition and social justice efforts.”
Nathan Young, cannabis policy lead for the Minnesota Black Chambers of Commerce, also described the new provisions as lacking discretion and reneging on an understanding that the Black community would receive a merit-based opportunity at receiving business licenses (2,4).
Before the session ends in the next few weeks, the Minnesota Senate will vote on a companion bill, which could involve a panel from both chambers potentially enabling more discussion and compromises (1,2).
References
The Top 10 Articles from Cannabis Science and Technology in 2024
January 7th 2025It’s that time of year again—the Cannabis Science and Technology (CST) top 10 articles from the previous year. CST published a wide variety of content throughout 2024. Here is just a small snippet of some of the top articles that our readers enjoyed. See if any of your favorites made the list!
Cannabis, US Presidential Election 2024, and Beyond: A Roundtable Discussion, Part II
December 17th 2024With the recent 2024 presidential election behind us, the future of cannabis still has many unknowns moving forward and questions still to be discussed. In this roundtable discussion with four knowledgeable industry leaders, we explore the nuanced political landscape of cannabis legalization and rescheduling in the context of the election, including state and federal policies and possible paths forward for testing standardization. Join us in the second part of a compilation of responses from Kim Anzarut, CQA, CP-FS, CEO of Allay Consulting; Susan Audino, PhD, founder of S.A. Audino & Associates, LLC; Zacariah Hildenbrand, PhD, research Professor at the University of Texas at El Paso; and David Vaillencourt, CEO of The GMP Collective.
Cannabis, US Presidential Election 2024, and Beyond: A Roundtable Discussion, Part I
December 16th 2024With the recent 2024 presidential election behind us, the future of cannabis still has many unknowns moving forward and questions still to be discussed. In this roundtable discussion with four knowledgeable industry leaders, we explore the nuanced political landscape of cannabis legalization and rescheduling in the context of the election. We discuss what drives support or opposition from both sides of the aisle, the complexities of balancing state and federal priorities, and more. Join us in the first part of a compilation of responses from Kim Anzarut, CQA, CP-FS, CEO of Allay Consulting; Susan Audino, PhD, founder of S.A. Audino & Associates, LLC; Zacariah Hildenbrand, PhD, research Professor at the University of Texas at El Paso; and David Vaillencourt, CEO of The GMP Collective.