NASDA Reignites Support for Hemp 1.0% THC Limit Increase
NASDA has reignited their support to raise the THC limit for hemp to 1.0%.
The United States (US) cannabis industry has faced challenges regarding tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) limits set from the 2014 Farm Bill and then remained in the 2018 Farm Bill (1). One of the key US farming associations is bringing the topic of a THC limit back onto the drawing board to be discussed. The National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA) has reiterated their support to increase the THC limit for industrial hemp crops to be 1.0% (1). The current regulation stated in the 2018 Farm Bill is for industrial hemp crops to have no more than a 0.3% THC limit (2). By increasing the amount, NASDA believes that cultivators would have additional opportunities in deciding what varieties they grow (1). As mentioned in HempToday (1), “NASDA represents state agriculture officials in all 50 states and four U.S. territories.”
In 2020, Kentucky Senator, Rand Paul, introduced the Hemp Economic Mobilization Plan Act, which was supported by NASDA (1,3). With the delay of the 2023 Farm Bill (1,4), industry stakeholders are now stuck waiting until Fall 2024 to see any changes on THC percentage limits.
Prior to and when the 2018 Farm Bill first was passed, the hemp industry has consistently urged for an increase regarding THC limits and has claimed that these regulations were created from past research that is out of date (1). If the limit is raised, this would additionally provide options for future research and the development of cultivars. For example, flowers, fiber, and grain (1).
A study performed in the 1970s by Canadian plant scientists, Ernest Small and Arthur Cronquist, for the International Association of Plant Taxonomy (1), was acknowledged in 1987 and set the precedence of dry weight from hemp flower material, which then created some differentiation between C. Sativa (industrial hemp) and C. Indica (cannabis). In a later revelation discussed in HempToday, Small discussed that both his and Cronquist’s findings were subjective (1).
Along with NASDA, an estimated 30 hemp industry groups are also reigniting the spark to increase the THC limit (1).
References
- HempToday. Key U.S. Farming Group Restates its Support for Raising Hemp THC Limit to 1.0% https://hemptoday.net/key-u-s-farming-group-restates-its-support-for-raising-hemp-thc-limit-to-1-0/ (accessed Jan 25, 2024).
- Abernethy, A. Hemp Production and the 2018 Farm Bill https://www.fda.gov/news-events/congressional-testimony/hemp-production-and-2018-farm-bill-07252019 (accessed Jan 25, 2024).
- HempToday. Proposal in USA Would Lift THC Barrier for Hemp to Full 1.0% https://hemptoday.net/proposal-in-usa-would-lift-thc-barrier-for-hemp-to-full-1-0/ (accessed Jan 25, 2024).
- Colli, M. 2018 Farm Bill Extended Throughout 2024 https://www.cannabissciencetech.com/view/2018-farm-bill-extended-throughout-2024 (accessed Jan 25, 2024).
Ep 25: Cannabis Quality Differentiation Beyond Cannabinoid Content
February 28th 2025In this latest installment of Noid Knowledge we are joined by Julie Kowalski, a leading mind in analytical chemistry and cannabis testing. Julie has arranged a very compelling symposium for Pittcon entitled Cannabis Aroma: Advances and Challenges in Determining and Commercializing Cannabis Product Quality Attributes. It is taking place on Wednesday, March 5, 2025, starting at 9:30 AM in room 209. The session features top notch speakers, including several previous guests of this show, and yours truly, discussing the next generation of quality assessment in cannabis.
Ep 24, Part III: Data Transparency in Cannabis Testing with Yasha Kahn
December 26th 2024In the final part of this episode, Evan Friedmann and Yasha Kahn discuss the need for a national entity to centralize cannabis data collection, moving from snapshot data to continuous updates. They emphasize the importance of accurate lab data and adverse event tracking, suggesting QR codes on packaging to report issues. Yasha suggests harsher consequences for result manipulation and suggests collaboration between state departments and federal entities to support underfunded regulators. They also discuss the potential benefits of off-the-shelf testing and the importance of stability testing. Finally, Yasha shares his top three reading recommendations for the audience.
