NASDA Reignites Support for Hemp 1.0% THC Limit Increase
NASDA has reignited their support to raise the THC limit for hemp to 1.0%.
The United States (US) cannabis industry has faced challenges regarding tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) limits set from the 2014 Farm Bill and then remained in the 2018 Farm Bill (1). One of the key US farming associations is bringing the topic of a THC limit back onto the drawing board to be discussed. The National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA) has reiterated their support to increase the THC limit for industrial hemp crops to be 1.0% (1). The current regulation stated in the 2018 Farm Bill is for industrial hemp crops to have no more than a 0.3% THC limit (2). By increasing the amount, NASDA believes that cultivators would have additional opportunities in deciding what varieties they grow (1). As mentioned in HempToday (1), “NASDA represents state agriculture officials in all 50 states and four U.S. territories.”
In 2020, Kentucky Senator, Rand Paul, introduced the Hemp Economic Mobilization Plan Act, which was supported by NASDA (1,3). With the delay of the 2023 Farm Bill (1,4), industry stakeholders are now stuck waiting until Fall 2024 to see any changes on THC percentage limits.
Prior to and when the 2018 Farm Bill first was passed, the hemp industry has consistently urged for an increase regarding THC limits and has claimed that these regulations were created from past research that is out of date (1). If the limit is raised, this would additionally provide options for future research and the development of cultivars. For example, flowers, fiber, and grain (1).
A study performed in the 1970s by Canadian plant scientists, Ernest Small and Arthur Cronquist, for the International Association of Plant Taxonomy (1), was acknowledged in 1987 and set the precedence of dry weight from hemp flower material, which then created some differentiation between C. Sativa (industrial hemp) and C. Indica (cannabis). In a later revelation discussed in HempToday, Small discussed that both his and Cronquist’s findings were subjective (1).
Along with NASDA, an estimated 30 hemp industry groups are also reigniting the spark to increase the THC limit (1).
References
- HempToday. Key U.S. Farming Group Restates its Support for Raising Hemp THC Limit to 1.0% https://hemptoday.net/key-u-s-farming-group-restates-its-support-for-raising-hemp-thc-limit-to-1-0/ (accessed Jan 25, 2024).
- Abernethy, A. Hemp Production and the 2018 Farm Bill https://www.fda.gov/news-events/congressional-testimony/hemp-production-and-2018-farm-bill-07252019 (accessed Jan 25, 2024).
- HempToday. Proposal in USA Would Lift THC Barrier for Hemp to Full 1.0% https://hemptoday.net/proposal-in-usa-would-lift-thc-barrier-for-hemp-to-full-1-0/ (accessed Jan 25, 2024).
- Colli, M. 2018 Farm Bill Extended Throughout 2024 https://www.cannabissciencetech.com/view/2018-farm-bill-extended-throughout-2024 (accessed Jan 25, 2024).
Ep 24, Part I: Data Transparency in Cannabis Testing with Yasha Khan
November 21st 2024Evan Friedmann interviews Yasha Khan, co-founder of MCR Labs, about his journey into the cannabis industry and his efforts to promote transparency and integrity in laboratory practices. Yasha discusses the origins of MCR Labs, which began in Massachusetts to meet the needs of the soon-to-be legal medical cannabis market. He explains the challenges faced, including result manipulation by labs and the impact on public health. Yasha's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) project aimed to gather testing data from 37 states, revealed significant discrepancies in potency and mold results. Despite some states' reluctance to share data, Yasha has made much of this data public, leading to collaborative research and publications on various aspects of cannabis testing.
Ep 23, Part III: Accreditation in the Cannabis Industry with Susan Audino
October 24th 2024In Part III of this episode, host Evan Friedmann is joined by Susan Audino, PhD, founder of S.A. Audino & Associates, LLC, and co-founder of Saturn Scientific, LLC, to examine the complexities of sampling in the cannabis industry, emphasizing the need for proper sampling plans, and methods.
